Volume 85, Issue 11 , Pages 1826-1836, November 2004
Effects of gender on neurologic and functional recovery after spinal cord injury
Abstract
Sipski ML, Jackson AB, Gómez-Marín O, Estores I, Stein A. Effects of gender on neurologic and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1826–36.
Objective
To assess gender differences in neurologic and functional outcome measures in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).
Design
Case series.
Settings
Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS) throughout the United States.
Participants
People (N=14,433) admitted to an MSCIS within 30 days of injury.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main outcome measures
Improvement in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor index score, ASIA Impairment Scale, level of injury, and FIM instrument scores after SCI.
Results
When examining subjects grouped by severity of injury, changes in ASIA motor index total scores, from system admission to 1-year anniversary, were significantly greater for women than men with either complete (P=.035) or incomplete (P=.031) injuries. Functional comparison of men and women, using the FIM motor subscale, revealed that men had higher FIM motor scores at rehabilitation discharge among those with motor-complete injuries, except for those with C1-4 and C6 neurologic levels. Women with motor-incomplete high tetraplegia (C1-4 levels) had higher discharge FIM motor scores than did similarly afflicted men. There were no significant differences in FIM motor scores among men and women with other levels of motor incomplete SCI.
Conclusions
Gender differences in SCI were seen in several areas. Women may have more natural neurologic recovery than men; however, for a given level and degree of neurologic injury, men tend to do better functionally than women at time of discharge from rehabilitation. Future prospective study of the effects of estrogen on neurologic recovery and the effects of gender on functional potential are recommended.
Key words: Gender , Rehabilitation , Spinal cord injuries
Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, US Department of Education (grant no. H133N000017).No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the author(s) or on any organizations with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(04)00626-4
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.031
© 2004 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 85, Issue 11 , Pages 1826-1836, November 2004
