Volume 85, Issue 11 , Pages 1804-1810, November 2004
Metric properties of the ASIA motor score: Subscales improve correlation with functional activities1 ☆
Abstract
Marino RJ, Graves DE. Metric properties of the ASIA motor score: subscales improve correlation with functional activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1804–10.
Objective
To apply item response theory (IRT) methods to neurologic and functional scales to determine the value of using American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor subscores and ability estimates, rather than total ASIA motor scores, to predict motor FIM instrument scores.
Design
Secondary analysis of prospectively collected data.
Setting
Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems centers.
Participants
People with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) (N=4338) discharged from inpatient rehabilitation between January 1, 1994, and March 31, 2003.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main outcome measures
Total discharge motor FIM scores, FIM subscale scores, and IRT-derived ability estimates of motor FIM scores.
Results
Use of separate ASIA upper-extremity and lower-extremity motor scores improved prediction of motor FIM scores over that of total ASIA motor score (R2 for motor FIM score, .71 vs .59). Use of IRT-based ability estimates derived by applying a 2-parameter graded response model to the raw scores, however, did not improve prediction of motor FIM scores above that of the ASIA motor subscale scores.
Conclusions
Consistent with the metric properties of the ASIA motor score, and with recent models of disablement, impairment in SCI is more accurately characterized by using separate ASIA upper- and lower-extremity motor scores than by using a single motor score. Use of subscores for impairment should improve prediction of functional abilities and enhance more complex models of disability.
Keywords: Activities of daily living, Factor analysis, statistical, Outcome assessment (health care), Rehabilitation, Spinal cord injuries
- 1 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
☆ Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, US Department of Education (grant no. H133N000023).
PII: S0003-9993(04)00480-0
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.026
© 2004 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 85, Issue 11 , Pages 1804-1810, November 2004
