Volume 85, Issue 11 , Pages 1793-1803, November 2004
Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury1 ☆
Abstract
Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, Tate DG, Bushnik T, Forchheimer MB. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1793–803.
Objectives
To investigate environmental barriers reported by people with spinal cord injury (SCI), and to determine the relative impact of environmental barriers compared with demographic and injury characteristics and activity limitations in predicting variation in participation and life satisfaction.
Design
Cross-sectional, follow-up survey.
Setting
Individuals rehabilitated at 16 federally designated Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems of care, now living in the community.
Participants
People with SCI (N=2726) who completed routine follow-up research interviews between 2000 and 2002.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main outcome measures
The Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors-Short Form (CHIEF-SF), the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique-Short Form, and the Satisfaction With Life Scale.
Results
The top 5 environmental barriers reported by subjects with SCI, in descending order of importance, were the natural environment, transportation, need for help in the home, availability of health care, and governmental policies. The CHIEF-SF subscales accounted for only 4% or less of the variation in participation; they accounted for 10% of the variation in life satisfaction.
Conclusions
The inclusion of environmental factors in models of disability was supported, but were found to be more strongly related to life satisfaction than to societal participation.
Keywords: Environment, Outcome assessment (health care), Rehabilitation, Spinal cord injuries
- 1 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
☆ Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, US Department of Education (grant no. H133N000001).
PII: S0003-9993(04)00475-7
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.024
© 2004 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 85, Issue 11 , Pages 1793-1803, November 2004
