Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 84, Issue 8 , Pages 1145-1149, August 2003

Satisfaction with upper-extremity surgery in individuals with tetraplegia1, 2

Presented in part at the Sixth International Conference on Surgical Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb in Tetraplegia, May 20\N23, 1998, Cleveland, OH, and the American Paraplegia Society’s annual meeting, September 5–7, 2000, Las Vegas, NV.

  • Kathryn Stroh Wuolle, CHT, OTR/L

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Functional Electrical Stimulation Center, Louis B. Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Anne M Bryden, OTR/L

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Functional Electrical Stimulation Center, Louis B. Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • P.Hunter Peckham, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Functional Electrical Stimulation Center, Louis B. Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Patrick K Murray, MD

      Affiliations

    • MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Michael Keith, MD

      Affiliations

    • Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

Abstract 

Wuolle KS, Bryden AM, Peckham PH, Murray PK, Keith M. Satisfaction with upper-extremity surgery in individuals with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1145–9.

Objective:

To measure the satisfaction of individuals with tetraplegia with their upper-extremity reconstructive surgery.

Design:

Survey.

Setting:

Two Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems centers.

Participants:

Sixty-seven individuals with spinal cord injury at the C4 through C8 motor level (107 arms).

Interventions:

Participants had upper-extremity surgery to improve function. The surgical procedures included tendon transfers for elbow extension, wrist extension, hand grasp, and pinch or hand grasp neuroprosthesis.

Main Outcome Measure:

A survey was mailed to participants, who were asked to respond to statements such as, “If I had it to do over, I would have the hand/arm surgery again,” using a 5-level Likert scale (ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree).

Results:

Seventy percent of the participants were generally satisfied with the results of their upper-extremity surgery, 77% reported a positive impact on their lives, 68% reported improvements in activities of daily living (ADLs), 66% reported improved independence, 69% reported improvement in occupation, 71% reported improved appearance or neutral, 78% reported their hand worked as well (or neutral) as it did when surgery was first performed, and 86% reported postoperative therapy as being beneficial.

Conclusions:

Upper-extremity surgery had a positive impact on life, increased ability to perform ADLs and to be independent, and improved quality of life.

Keywords:  Patient satisfaction, Tetraplegia, Quadriplegia, Quality of life, Rehabilitation, Tendon transfer

 
  • 1 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or any organization with which the authors are associated.
  • 2 Reprint requests to Laura Polacek, MetroHealth Medical Center, Rehabilitation Engineering Center (H601), 2500 MetroHealth Dr, Cleveland, OH 44109-1998, e-mail: LKP3@po.cwru.edu

 Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, US Department of Education, and the Rehabilitation Research and Development Center of Excellence in Functional Electrical Stimulation, Department of Veterans Affairs, and the General Clinical Research Center, National Institutes of Health (grant no. MO1RR00080).

PII: S0003-9993(03)00292-2

doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00292-2

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 84, Issue 8 , Pages 1145-1149, August 2003