Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 84, Issue 8 , Pages 1125-1128, August 2003

Pain in persons with cerebral palsy: extension and cross validation1

Presented as a poster at the American Pain Society’s Annual Scientific Meeting, March 14–17, 2002, Baltimore, MD.

  • Joyce M Engel, PhD, OT

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Joyce M. Engel, PhD, OT, Dept of Rehabilitation Medicine, Univ of Washington, Box 356490, Seattle, WA, USA 98195-6490
    • Department of Rehabilitation, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
  • ,
  • Mark P Jensen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
    • University of Washington Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Seattle, WA, USA
  • ,
  • Amy J Hoffman, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
  • ,
  • Deborah Kartin, PhD, PT

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA

Abstract 

Engel JM, Jensen MP, Hoffman AJ, Kartin D. Pain in persons with cerebral palsy: extension and cross validation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1125–8.

Objective:

To cross-validate and extend the assessment of pain in persons with cerebral palsy (CP).

Design:

Standardized in-person interviews.

Setting:

University medical clinics and local residential and community housing for persons with developmental disabilities.

Participants:

One hundred adults with CP.

Interventions:

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures:

Measures of pain intensity, pain interference in daily activities, psychologic function, significance of pain problem, and satisfaction with pain treatment.

Results:

Sixty-seven (67%) subjects reported 1 or more chronic pain problem(s). Low back, hip, and leg pain were most common. Twenty-four percent reported constant pain; 19% reported that pain occurred daily. Mean pain intensity ± standard deviation over the previous week on an 11-point scale (0, no pain; 10, pain as bad as could be) was 4.08±2.25. Minor interference (2.55±3.03; scale range, 0–10) from pain with routine daily activities was reported. Responses to the Satisfaction with Life Scale (n=63) indicated only moderate life satisfaction (18.44±8.34; scale range, 5–35) among those with 1 or more pain problem(s). Responses to the Rand Mental Health Inventory (n=65; mean score, 60.65±20.36) revealed relatively high levels of psychologic distress in those with chronic pain. Consumer satisfaction with pain management care varied, with 32.8% of the subjects reporting dissatisfaction.

Conclusions:

The study findings are consistent with earlier findings concerning pain problems in adults with CP and provide further evidence that pain problems may be overlooked and undertreated in this population.

Keywords:  Cerebral palsy, Pain, Rehabilitation

 
  • 1 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

 Supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (grant no. PO1 ND/NS 33988).

PII: S0003-9993(03)00263-6

doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00263-6

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 84, Issue 8 , Pages 1125-1128, August 2003