Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 83, Issue 1 , Pages 10-18 , January 2002

The Wheelchair Skills Test: A pilot study of a new outcome measure

,Revised 3 January 2001 ,Accepted 3 January 2001.

References 

  1. Kirby RL. Principles of wheelchair design and prescription. In:  Lazar RB editors. Principles of neurologic rehabilitation. New York: : McGraw-Hill; 1997;p. 465–481
  2. People with disabilities in basic life activities in the U.S. Disabilities Statistics Program. No. 3. San Francisco: : Univ California, San Francisco; April 1992; Disability Statistics Abstract
  3. Jones M, Sanford JA. People with mobility impairments in the United States today and in 2010. Assist Technol. 1996;8:43–53
  4. Axelson P, Minkel J, Chesney D. A guide to wheelchair selection: how to use the ANSI/RESNA wheelchair standards to buy a wheelchair. Washington (DC): : Paralyzed Veterans of America; 1994;
  5. Axelson P, Chesney DA, Minkel J. Powered mobility device skills test. In: RESNA 2000, Technology for the New Millenium; 2000 June 28-July 2. Orlando (FL). Washington (DC): : RESNA Pr; 2000;p. 450–452
  6. Cooper RA. Wheelchair selection and configuration. New York: : Demos Medical; 1998;
  7. Gresham GE, Granger CV, Linn RT, Kulas MA. Status of functional outcomes for stroke survivors. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 1999;10:957–966
  8. Wood-Dauphinee SL, Opzoomer MA, Williams JI, Marchand B, Spitzer WO. Assessment of global function: the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:583–590
  9. Boninger ML, Cooper RA, Baldwin MA, Shimada SD, Koontz A. Wheelchair pushrim kinetics: body weight and median nerve function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:910–915
  10. Butler C, Okamoto GA, McKay TM. Motorized wheelchair driving by disabled children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984;65:95–97
  11. Deitz J, Jaffe KM, Wolf LS, Massagli TL, Anson D. Pediatric power wheelchair: evaluation of function in the home and school environment. Assist Technol. 1991;3:24–31
  12. Tefft D, Furumasu J, Guerette P. Cognitive predictors of successful powered wheelchair control in the very young child. In:  Presperin JJ editors. RESNA International 92, Technology for Consumers; 1992 April; Toronto (Ont). Washington (DC): : RESNA Pr; 1992;p. 412–414
  13. In:  Jaffe KM editors. RESNA First Northwest Regional Conference, Childhood powered mobility: developmental, technical and clinical perspective. Washington (DC): : RESNA Pr; 1987 Mar 6; Seattle (WA) 1987
  14. Field D. Powered mobility: a literature review illustrating the importance of a multifaceted approach. Assist Technol. 1999;11:20–33
  15. Letts L, Dawson D, Kaiserman-Goldenstein E. Development of the power-mobility community driving assessment. Can J Rehabil. 1998;11:123–129
  16. Webster JS, Cottam G, Gouvier WD, Blanton P, Beissel GF, Wofford J. Wheelchair obstacle performance in right cerebral vascular accident victims. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1988;11:295–310
  17. Webster JS, Roades LA, Morrill B, et al.  Rightward orienting bias, wheelchair maneuvering, and fall risk. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:924–928
  18. Harvey LA, Batty J, Fahey A. Reliability of a tool for assessing mobility in wheelchair-dependent paraplegics. Spinal Cord. 1998;26:427–430
  19. Means KM, Rodell DE, O'Sullivan PS. Obstacle course performance and risk of falling in community-dwelling elderly persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1570–1576
  20. Kirby RL, Lugar JA. Spotter strap for the prevention of wheelchair tipping. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1354–1356
  21. Guyatt GH, Townsend M, Berman LB, Keller JL. A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:1129–1133
  22. Kirby RL, Dupuis DJ. Clinical measurement of the static rear stability of occupied wheelchairs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:199–205
  23. Brubaker CE, McLaurin CA, McClay IS. Effects of side slope on wheelchair performance. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1986;23:55–57
  24. Kirby RL, Ethans KD, Duggan RE, Saunders-Green LA, Lugar JA, Harrison ER. Wheelchair propulsion: descriptive comparison of hemiplegic and two-hand patterns during selected activities. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;78:131–135
  25. American National Standard for Buildings and Facilities . Providing accessibility and useability for physically handicapped people. ANSI A117.1-1986. New York: : American National Standards Institute; 1986;
  26. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 . Accessibility guidelines for buildings and facilities (ADAAG). 56 Federal Register 35635. 1991;
  27. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Part 1192. Accessibility guidelines for transportation vehicles. Pub L No. 101-336, 104 Stat 370, 42 USC §12204 (1991).
  28. Canale I, Felici F, Marchetti M, Ricci B. Ramp length/grade prescriptions for wheelchair dependent individuals. Paraplegia. 1991;29:479–485
  29. Cappozzo A, Felici F, Figura F, Marchetti M, Ricci B. Prediction of ramp traversability for wheelchair dependent individuals. Paraplegia. 1991;29:470–478
  30. Tranter RT, Slater R, Vaughan N. Barriers to mobility: physically-disabled and frail elderly people in their local outdoor environment. Int J Rehabil Res. 1991;14:303–312
  31. Wolfe GA, Waters R, Hislop HJ. Influence of floor surface on the energy cost of wheelchair propulsion. Phys Ther. 1977;57:1022–1027
  32. Zissermann L, Tumiel J. The architectural accessibility of urban facilities to the disabled: a summary of descriptive survey results. Paraplegia. 1989;27:370–371
  33. Enders A, Hall M. Personal care/home: accessibility/architectural adaptation/design. In:  Enders A,  Hall M editor. Assistive technology sourcebook. Washington (DC): : RESNA Pr; 1990;p. 156–159
  34. Burgdorf RL. Equal access to public accommodations. In:  West J editors. The Americans with Disabilities Act: from policy to practice. New York: : Milbank Memorial Fund; 1991;p. 183–213
  35. Couch RH. Ramps not steps: a study of accessibility preferences. J Rehabil. 1992;58:65–69
  36. Reid DT. Barriers experienced by nondisabled wheelchair users: a university-based occupational therapy program educational exercise. Assist Technol. 1999;11:54–58
  37. Nelson CF, Jones ML, Salkind NJ. Promoting wheelchair accessibility of private business settings: an analysis of the effects of information prompts, feedback, and incentives. Environ Behav. 1986;18:132–145
  38. Rahman MM, Sprigle S. Physical accessibility guidelines of consumer product controls. Assist Technol. 1997;9:3–14
  39. Pierce LL. Barriers to access: frustrations of people who use a wheelchair for full-time mobility. Rehabil Nurs. 1998;23:120–125
  40. McClain L, Cram A, Wood J, Taylor M. Wheelchair accessibility—living the experience: function in the community. Occup Ther J Res. 1998;18:25–43
  41. Sanford JA, Story MF, Jones ML. An analysis of the effects of ramp slope on people with mobility impairments. Assist Technol. 1997;9:22–33
  42. Penta M, Thonnard J-L, Tesio L. ABILHAND: a Rasch-built measure of manual ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1038–1042
  43. Tesio L, Alpini D, Cesarani A, Perucca L. Short form of the dizziness handicap inventory. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;78:233–241
  44. Tsuji T, Liu M, Toikawa H, Hanayama K, Sonoda S, Chino N. ADL structure for nondisabled Japanese children based on the Functional Independence Measure for children (WeeFIM). Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;78:208–212
  45. Baker JG, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. A brief outpatient functional assessment measure: validity using Rasch measures. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;76:8–13
  46. Kirby RL, Lugar JA, Breckenridge C. New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: controlled trial of safety and efficacy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:380–390

☆ Supported in part by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research and the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre Research Fund.

☆☆ No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

★ Reprint requests to R. Lee Kirby, MD, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Rehabilitation Centre, 1341 Summer St, Halifax, NS B3H 4K4, Canada, e-mail: kirby@is.dal.ca.

★★ Supplier

♢ a. Clinical Locomotor Function Laboratory, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Rehabilitation Centre Site, 1341 Summer St, Halifax, NS B3H 4K4, Canada.

PII: S0003-9993(02)89995-6

doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.26823

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 83, Issue 1 , Pages 10-18 , January 2002

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution