Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 84, Issue 6 , Pages 843-848, June 2003

Agonist contractions against electrically stimulated antagonists1

  • Tojiro Yanagi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Rehabilitation Center Kurume University, Kurume City, Japan
  • ,
  • Naoto Shiba, MD

      Affiliations

    • Rehabilitation Center Kurume University, Kurume City, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Naoto Shiba, MD, Rehabilitation Center, Kurume University, 155-1 Kokubu-machi, Kurume City, Fukuoka 8390863, Japan
  • ,
  • Takashi Maeda, PT

      Affiliations

    • Rehabilitation Center Kurume University, Kurume City, Japan
  • ,
  • Kiyohiko Iwasa, PT

      Affiliations

    • Rehabilitation Center Kurume University, Kurume City, Japan
  • ,
  • Yuichi Umezu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Rehabilitation Center Kurume University, Kurume City, Japan
  • ,
  • Yoshihiko Tagawa, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kurume Institute of Technology, Kurume City, Japan
  • ,
  • Shigeaki Matsuo, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kurume Institute of Technology, Kurume City, Japan
  • ,
  • Kensei Nagata, MD

      Affiliations

    • Toyama Prefectural Koshi Rehabilitation Hospital, Toyama City, Japan
  • ,
  • Toshiyasu Yamamoto, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, Kurume University, Kurume City, Japan
  • ,
  • Jeffrey R Basford, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester MN, USA

Abstract 

Yanagi T, Shiba N, Maeda T, Iwasa K, Umezu Y, Tagawa Y, Matsuo S, Nagata K, Yamamoto T, Basford JR. Agonist contractions against electrically stimulated antagonists.

Objective:

To assess an exercise program that uses electrically stimulated antagonists to resist agonist muscle contractions.

Design:

In 1 limb, electrically stimulated antagonists resisted elbow flexion and extension. In the other, stimulation occurred without volitional muscle contraction.

Setting:

A biomechanics laboratory in Japan.

Participants:

Twelve men between the ages of 19 and 24 years. Subjects served as their own controls.

Intervention:

Subjects trained 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Each session consisted of 10 sets of 10 elbow flexor and extensor contractions.

Main Outcome Measures:

Isokinetic elbow extension and flexion torques. Biceps and triceps brachii cross-sectional areas.

Results:

Elbow extension torques increased (32.85% at 30°/s, 27.20% at 60°/s, 26.16% at 90°/s; all P≤.02) over the training period in limbs that trained against electrically stimulated antagonists. Control limb extension torque increases were smaller (8.52% –14.91%) and did not reach statistical significance. Elbow flexion torques improved in both groups, but the changes did not reach statistical significance. Cross-sectional areas increased in all muscles but were most marked in the antagonist stimulated limbs: triceps 16.20% versus 4.25% (P=.01) and biceps 16.65% versus 7.00% (P=.005).

Conclusions:

Exercises that use electrically stimulated antagonist muscles may be effective in increasing muscle strength and mass.

Keywords:  Electric stimulation, Exercise, Muscles, Rehabilitation, Torque

 
  • 1 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(02)04948-1

doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(02)04948-1

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 84, Issue 6 , Pages 843-848, June 2003