Volume 82, Issue 8 , Pages 1089-1098, August 2001
Back and abdominal muscle function during stabilization exercises☆1☆2☆3☆4☆5☆6☆7☆8☆9
Abstract
Arokoski JP, Valta T, Airaksinen O, Kankaanpää M. Back and abdominal muscle function during stabilization exercises. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82;1089-98. Objectives: To assess the paraspinal and abdominal muscle activities during different therapeutic exercises and to study how load increment produced by varying limb movements and trunk positions could affect these muscle activities. Design: A cross-sectional study comparing muscle activities between men and women. Setting: Rehabilitation clinic in university hospital. Participants: Twenty-four healthy volunteers (14 women, 10 men) aged 21 to 39 years. Interventions: Subjects performed 16 different therapeutic exercises commonly used to treat low back pain. Main Outcome Measures: Surface electromyography was recorded from the paraspinal (T9, L5) and abdominal (rectus abdominis, obliquus externus) muscles during these exercises. Average electromyographic amplitudes obtained during the excercises were normalized to the amplitude in maximal voluntary contraction (% MVC) to produce interindividually comparable muscle activity assessments. Results: Mean average normalized electromyographic amplitudes (% MVC) of the exercises were below 50% MVC. At L5 level, the multifidus muscle activities were significantly higher (p < .05) in women than in men, whereas no significant difference was found at T9 level. Similarly, rectus abdominis and obliquus externus activities were significantly higher (p < .001, p < .05) in women than in men. Load increment in hands or unbalanced trunk and limb movements produced higher paraspinal and abdominal muscle activities (p < .05). Conclusions: Simple therapeutic exercises are effective in activating both abdominal and paraspinal muscles. By changing limb and trunk positions or unbalancing trunk movements, it is possible to increase trunk muscle activities. Women were better able to activate their stabilizing trunk muscles than men; but it is also possible that men, having a much higher degree of strength on maximal contraction, only need to activate a smaller amount of that maximum to perform a similar activity. © 2001 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Keywords: Abdominal muscles, Back, Electromyography, Low back pain, Muscles, Rehabilitation
☆1 Supported by grants from Kuopio University Hospital.
☆2 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
☆3 Reprint requests to Jari Arokoski, MD, PhD, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 1777, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland, e-mail: Jari.Arokoski@kuh.fi.
☆4 Suppliers
☆5 a. MIE; Medical Research Ltd, Kuntoväline Oy, Oltermannintie 8 00620 Helsinki, Finland.
☆6 b. Model M-00-S; Medicotest A/S, Rugmarken 10, DK-3650 Olstykke, Denmark.
☆7 c. Mega Electronics Ltd, PO Box 1750, Savilahdentie 6, 70211. Kuopio, Finland.
☆8 d. Loredan Biomedical, 3650 Industrial Blvd, West Sacramento, CA 95691.
☆9 e. Airex®; Alusuisse Airex AG, Specialty Foams, CH-5643 Sins, Switzerland.
PII: S0003-9993(01)85923-2
doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.23819
© 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 82, Issue 8 , Pages 1089-1098, August 2001
