Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 82, Issue 8 , Pages 1081-1088 , August 2001

Contraction of the pelvic floor muscles during abdominal maneuvers

,Accepted 6 September 2000.

  • Image Result

    (A) Placement of vaginal and anal electromyographic electrodes. Electrodes were situated on either side of the intravaginal probe and anal electrodes were adhered to the right and left anal wall (only

    (A) Placement of vaginal and anal electromyographic electrodes. Electrodes were situated on either side of the intravaginal probe and anal electrodes were adhered to the right and left anal wall (only the left anal electrode is shown). (B) Placement of vaginal and anal pressure probes. (C) Recordings of electromyographic activity of the hip adductor and gluteus maximus along with concurrent recordings from the anal and vaginal electrodes.

  • Image Result
    Relation between anal and gastric pressures. (A) Maximal pelvic floor contraction. (B) Strong abdominal muscle contraction. Pressures are shown during contractions of the abdominal and pelvic floor mu

    Relation between anal and gastric pressures. (A) Maximal pelvic floor contraction. (B) Strong abdominal muscle contraction. Pressures are shown during contractions of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles. The data suggest that the pressure recordings were independent, and thus the pelvic pressure were not simply due to transmitted pressure from the abdominal cavity.

  • Image Result
    Abdominal muscle activity during the experimental tasks in supine. Abdominal (Abd) muscle activity with each level of contraction are shown as (A) the mean change in width recorded using ultrasound, (

    Abdominal muscle activity during the experimental tasks in supine. Abdominal (Abd) muscle activity with each level of contraction are shown as (A) the mean change in width recorded using ultrasound, (B) mean change in electromyographic activity for all subjects recorded with surface electromyography (Abd) and with fine-wire electrodes for 1 subject (TrA, OI, OE), and (C) raw electromyographic data recorded with fine-wire electrodes (n = 1). (B) surfaceelectro myographic electrodes, and (C) and fine-wire electromyographic electrodes (n = 1) (B & C) are shown. (B) Gastric pressure recorded with each abdominal contraction are also shown (n = 2). (A) The inset shows the method for measurement of muscle width on the ultrasound image of the lateral abdominal wall. Activity was increased in the strong condition, but there was no difference between the gentle and moderate conditions.

  • Image Result
    Electromyographic activity of the pelvic floor and abdominal muscles with abdominal and pelvic floor muscle contractions. The representative raw electromyography shows that activity of the pelvic floo

    Electromyographic activity of the pelvic floor and abdominal muscles with abdominal and pelvic floor muscle contractions. The representative raw electromyography shows that activity of the pelvic floor muscles accompanied all levels of abdominal muscle activity. Abbreviation: Abd, abdominal muscle.

  • Image Result
    Mean change in pelvic floor response with abdominal muscle contraction. Mean (A) electromyographic and (B) pressure data for the group are shown normalized to the amplitude recorded with the maximal c

    Mean change in pelvic floor response with abdominal muscle contraction. Mean (A) electromyographic and (B) pressure data for the group are shown normalized to the amplitude recorded with the maximal contraction of the pelvic floor muscles. Abbreviations: AP, anal pressure; VP, vaginal pressure.

  • Image Result
    Pelvic floor pressures and abdominal muscle electromyography with abdominal and pelvic floor muscle contractions. The representative data (same subject as fig 4) shows that activity of the pelvic floo

    Pelvic floor pressures and abdominal muscle electromyography with abdominal and pelvic floor muscle contractions. The representative data (same subject as fig 4) shows that activity of the pelvic floor muscles accompanied all levels of abdominal muscle activity.

  • Image Result
    Latency between onsets of the increase in gastric and pelvic floor pressures. Representative (A) raw data and (B) data from single subjects are presented. The raw data in A show an increase in anal pr

    Latency between onsets of the increase in gastric and pelvic floor pressures. Representative (A) raw data and (B) data from single subjects are presented. The raw data in A show an increase in anal pressure of almost 500ms before an increase in gastric pressure. (B) All onsets of vaginal and anal pressure are shown relative to the onset of the gastric pressure increase at zero.

  • Image Result
    Mean change in pelvic floor muscle electromyography with abdominal contraction in standing position. Data are presented with subjects standing in (A) neutral and (B) with slight lumbar flexion.

    Mean change in pelvic floor muscle electromyography with abdominal contraction in standing position. Data are presented with subjects standing in (A) neutral and (B) with slight lumbar flexion.

☆1 Supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. Equipment provided by Arthur Algate, Advantage Health Care, Pty Ltd.

☆2 The author(s) has/have chosen not to select a disclosure statement.

☆3 Reprint requests to Ruth R. Sapsford, DipPhty, Dept of Physiotherapy, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Raymond Ter, South Brisbane, QLD 4101 Australia, e-mail: rsapsford@ozemail.com.au.

☆4 Suppliers

☆5 a. NEEN HealthCare, Old Pharmacy Yard, Church St, Dereham, Norfolk, NR19 1DJ, England.

☆6 b. Medtronic, Tonsbakken 16-18, DK-2740 Skovlunde, Denmark.

☆7 c. ConMed Corp, 310 Broad St, Utica, NY 13501.

☆8 d. A-M Systems Inc, 11627-A Airport Rd, Everett, WA 98204.

☆9 e. Incare Medical Products, 2000 Hollister Dr, Libertyville, IL 60048.

☆10 f. Gaeltec Ltd, Dunvegan, Isle of Skye, Scotland IV55 8GU, UK.

☆11 g. 128XP/4; Acuson Corp, 1220 Charleston Rd, PO Box 7393, Mountain View, CA 94039-7393.

☆12 h. Digitimer Ltd, 37 Hydeway, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, AL7 3BE, England.

☆13 i. Cambridge Electronic Design Ltd, Science Park, Milton Rd, Cambridge CB4 0FE, UK.

☆14 j. StatSoft Inc, 2300 E 14th St, Tulsa, OK 74104.

PII: S0003-9993(01)28312-9

doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24297

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 82, Issue 8 , Pages 1081-1088 , August 2001