Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 92, Issue 12 , Pages 2041-2056, December 2011

The Effect of Neuroscience Education on Pain, Disability, Anxiety, and Stress in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

  • Adriaan Louw, PT, MAppSc

      Affiliations

    • International Spine Pain Institute and Neuro Orthopaedic Institute, Story City, IA
  • ,
  • Ina Diener, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiotherapy, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
  • ,
  • David S. Butler, PT, EdD

      Affiliations

    • Neuro Orthopaedic Institute and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia
  • ,
  • Emilio J. Puentedura, PT, DPT

      Affiliations

    • International Spine Pain Institute and Neuro Orthopaedic Institute, Story City, IA
    • Department of Physical Therapy, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Emilio J. Puentedura, PT, DPT, Assistant Professor, University of Nevada Las Vegas, School of Allied Health Sciences, Dept of Physical Therapy, 4505 Maryland Pkwy, Box 453029, Las Vegas, NV 89154-3029

Abstract 

Louw A, Diener I, Butler DS, Puentedura EJ. The effect of neuroscience education on pain, disability, anxiety, and stress in chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Objective

To evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness of neuroscience education (NE) for pain, disability, anxiety, and stress in chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain.

Data Sources

Systematic searches were conducted on Biomed Central, BMJ.com, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, NLM Central Gateway, OVID, ProQuest (Digital Dissertations), PsycInfo, PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Secondary searching (PEARLing) was undertaken, whereby reference lists of the selected articles were reviewed for additional references not identified in the primary search.

Study Selection

All experimental studies including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomized clinical trials, and case series evaluating the effect of NE on pain, disability, anxiety, and stress for chronic MSK pain were considered for inclusion. Additional limitations: studies published in English, published within the last 10 years, and patients older than 18 years. No limitations were set on specific outcome measures of pain, disability, anxiety, and stress.

Data Extraction

Data were extracted using the participants, interventions, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) approach.

Data Synthesis

Methodological quality was assessed by 2 reviewers using the Critical Review Form–Quantitative Studies. This review includes 8 studies comprising 6 high-quality RCTs, 1 pseudo-RCT, and 1 comparative study involving 401 subjects. Most articles were of good quality, with no studies rated as poor or fair. Heterogeneity across the studies with respect to participants, interventions evaluated, and outcome measures used prevented meta-analyses. Narrative synthesis of results, based on effect size, established compelling evidence that NE may be effective in reducing pain ratings, increasing function, addressing catastrophization, and improving movement in chronic MSK pain.

Conclusions

For chronic MSK pain disorders, there is compelling evidence that an educational strategy addressing neurophysiology and neurobiology of pain can have a positive effect on pain, disability, catastrophization, and physical performance.

Key Words:  Education , Musculoskeletal System , Neurophysiology , Neurosciences , Pain , Rehabilitation

List of Abbreviations:  BPPT, brachial plexus provocation test, CFS, chronic fatigue syndrome, CLBP, chronic low back pain, CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, LBP, low back pain, MSK, musculoskeletal, NE, neuroscience education, NPRS, numeric pain rating scale, PCI, Pain Coping Inventory, PCS, Pain Catastrophization Scale, PICO, participants, interventions, comparison, outcomes, PPT, pressure pain threshold, PSEQ, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, RCT, randomized controlled trial, RMDQ, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, SLR, straight leg raise, SOPA(R), Survey of Pain Attitudes (Revised), TSK, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, VAS, visual analog scale, WAD, whiplash-associated disorders

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(11)00670-8

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.198

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 92, Issue 12 , Pages 2041-2056, December 2011