Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 5 , Pages 768-777, May 2009

Clinical Outcomes for Patients Classified by Fear-Avoidance Beliefs and Centralization Phenomenon

  • Mark W. Werneke, PT, MS

      Affiliations

    • Spine Rehabilitation at CentraState Medical Center, Freehold, NJ
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Mark W. Werneke, PT, MS, Dip. MDT at CentraState Medical Center, 901 West Main St, Freehold, NJ 07728
  • ,
  • Dennis L. Hart, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes Inc, White Stone, VA
  • ,
  • Steven Z. George, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Brooks Center for Rehabilitation Studies, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL
  • ,
  • Paul W. Stratford, PT, MS

      Affiliations

    • School of Rehabilitation Science and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • James W. Matheson, PT, DPT

      Affiliations

    • Therapy Partners Inc, Burnsville, MN
  • ,
  • Adrian Reyes, PT

      Affiliations

    • Spine Rehabilitation at CentraState Medical Center, Freehold, NJ

Abstract 

Werneke MW, Hart DL, George SZ, Stratford PW, Matheson JW, Reyes A. Clinical outcomes for patients classified by fear-avoidance beliefs and centralization phenomenon.

Objectives

To (1) determine the prevalence of pain pattern classification subgroups (centralization, noncentralization, and not classified) observed during the initial evaluation of patients experiencing high versus low Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire for physical activity (FABQ-PA) scores, (2) examine the association between discharge pain intensity and functional status (FS) outcomes based on FABQ-PA and pain pattern subgroups, and (3) compare minimal clinically important improvement for FS and pain intensity for FABQ-PA and pain pattern classification subgroups.

Design

Observational cohort design.

Setting

Suburban hospital-based outpatient rehabilitation clinic.

Participants

Consecutive patients with low back syndromes (N=238, mean ± SD, 59.1±17.0y; minimum=20, maximum=91).

Interventions

Interventions were designed to match patient classification by fear-avoidance level and pain pattern.

Main Outcome Measures

Two outcome measures were assessed: patient self-reported FS and pain intensity. FS was assessed by using computerized adaptive testing methods. Maximal pain intensity was assessed by using an 11-point numeric pain scale: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

Results

There were no differences (χ22=3.7, P=.16) in proportion of patients classified by pain pattern experiencing high or low fear-avoidance beliefs. After controlling for the effect of available risk-adjustment variables, only dual-level classification subgroups, symptom acuity, payer type, and intake FS or pain intensity were associated with discharge FS or pain outcomes. The highest proportion of patients achieving minimal clinically important improvement in pain and FS were reported by the following patient subgroup: centralization and low fear.

Conclusions

Pain pattern and FABQ-PA characteristics impacted rehabilitation outcomes. We recommend that both factors be considered when managing patients with low back pain in an effort to optimize rehabilitation outcomes.

Key Words: Low back pain, Outcome assessment (health care), Rehabilitation

List of Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval, FS, functional status, FABQ, Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire, FABQ-PA, Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire for Physical Activity, LBP, low back pain

 

 A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a financial benefit on the author or one or more of the authors. Dr Hart is an investor in and employee of Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes Inc. Analyses of data and reporting of results of those analyses such as those reported in this manuscript are part of his routine, daily activities.

PII: S0003-9993(09)00084-7

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.008

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 5 , Pages 768-777, May 2009