Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 5 , Page 1005, May 2008

Survival of Persons With Locked-In Syndrome

Article Outline

 

In a 1987 study, Haig et al1 reported on 27 patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS). A slightly expanded group of 29 patients was studied by Katz2 and Doble3 and colleagues. To our knowledge, these are the largest follow-up studies of persons with LIS, and the only ones to report survival probabilities. Their findings on longevity were summarized by Doble as follows: “Five-, 10-, and 20-year survival were 83%, 83%, and 40% respectively.”3(p438)

Unfortunately, these probabilities reflect a methodologic problem. Survival time was counted from the first anniversary of the onset of LIS. However, in some instances, follow-up began many years later, and thus subjects were “guaranteed” to survive until the beginning of follow-up: those who died in the interim never entered the study. As an illustration of the problem, figure 1 of Doble3 shows survival over a 25-year period even though the subjects were followed for only 11 years.

To correct the survival probabilities, we counted each person's survival time only from the time at which they were “exposed” to death (ie, if they died they would still have been included in the study). Then a Kaplan-Meier analysis4 gave survival probabilities of 84% at 5 years and 56% at 10 years. The 20-year survival probability cannot be computed directly from the observed data, but the use of some standard actuarial assumptions leads to an estimate of 31%.

In addition to the above, 2 additional facts should be noted: (1) the subject population included primarily elective admissions to a world-class facility, and this may have led to an overestimate of survival; and (2) any advances in medical care since the study period would suggest that these figures underestimate survival.

Nevertheless, the above figures are compatible with those derived for other types of neurologic injury and comparable physical disabilities. Examples are the permanent vegetative state,5 traumatic brain injury,6 and cerebral palsy.7

Disclosure: No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Haig AJ, Katz RT, Sahgal V. Mortality and complications of the locked-in syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:24–27
  2. Katz RT, Haig AJ, Clark BB, DiPaola RJ. Long-term survival, prognosis, and life-care planning for 29 patients with chronic locked-in syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:403–408
  3. Doble JE, Haig AJ, Anderson C, Katz R. Impairment, activity, participation, life satisfaction, and survival in persons with locked-in syndrome for over a decade: follow-up on a previously reported cohort. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;18:435–444
  4. Kahn HA, Sempos CT. Statistical methods in epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford Univ Pr; 1989;
  5. Strauss DJ, Shavelle RM, Ashwal S. Life expectancy and median survival time in the permanent vegetative state. Pediatric Neurol. 1999;21:626–631
  6. Shavelle RM, Strauss DJ, Day SM, Ojdana KA. Life expectancy. In:  Zasler ND,  Katz DI,  Zafonte RD editor. Brain injury medicine: principles and practice. New York: Demos; 2007;
  7. Strauss DJ, Shavelle RM. Life expectancy of adults with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40:369–375

PII: S0003-9993(08)00218-9

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.03.004

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 89, Issue 5 , Page 1005, May 2008