Volume 88, Issue 10 , Pages 1249-1255, October 2007
Does the Presence of a Specialized Rehabilitation Unit in a Veterans Affairs Facility Impact Referral for Rehabilitative Care After a Lower-Extremity Amputation?
Abstract
Bates BE, Kurichi JE, Marshall CR, Reker D, Maislin G, Stineman MG. Does the presence of a specialized rehabilitation unit in a Veterans Affairs facility impact referral for rehabilitative care after a lower-extremity amputation?
Objective
To determine if the presence of specialized rehabilitation units (SRUs) within Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMC) influences access to rehabilitation services.
Design
Retrospective cohort analysis.
Setting
Two types of VAMCs: those with and without SRUs.
Participants
Veterans with lower-extremity amputations discharged from VAMCs between October 1, 2002, and September 30, 2003. There were a total of 2375 veterans with amputations: 99% were men; and 60% had transtibial, 40% had transfemoral, and less than 1% had hip disarticulation amputations. Nine hundred sixty-six patients (41%) were seen at a VAMC with an SRU.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure
Level of service provided expressed as: no evidence of rehabilitation during the hospitalization, generalized rehabilitation through consultation only, or admission to an SRU.
Results
There were no differences between patients treated at facilities with SRUs and those treated in a facility without SRU beds with respect to age, sex, marital status, source of hospital admission, or level of amputation (all P<.05). Patients with lower initial FIM instrument scores were more likely to be treated in facilities with SRUs, and to have longer lengths of acute hospitalization (P<.01). Patients at facilities with an SRU compared with those without an SRU had comparable likelihoods of being seen for an initial rehabilitation consultation (75% vs 74%, P=.56), but were more likely to be admitted for high intensity specialty rehabilitation services (26% vs 11%, P<.01).
Conclusions
Although the majority of patients were seen in consultation, structural differences in service availability among clinically similar populations appear to be causing access disparities to specialized rehabilitation among amputees in the VAMC setting. The implication of these differences with regard to patient outcomes will need to be determined.
Key Words: Amputation, Leg, Rehabilitation, Veterans
Supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (grant no. Ro1 HD042588), the Samuel S. Stratton Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albany, NY, and the Kansas City Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, MO.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
Reprints are not available from the author.
PII: S0003-9993(07)00439-X
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.018
© 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 88, Issue 10 , Pages 1249-1255, October 2007
